Danhedonia
Noted duckfat enthusiast
I think the ship sailed on Gruden a long, long time ago. Sometime in the not too distant future, he's getting bought out by Mark Davis.
I don’t get to see any Raiders games, but after watching the Bears these last 2 weeks, WTF was Gruden thinking shipping him off to Chicago? He is a 1 man wrecking crew.
Meh. 52 looked really good. No O line, or one that basically just gets in your line of sight as they let everything through anyway, makes things hard.Oh, and:
Bearsss.
FIFY
The Bears just got Khalil Mack from the Raiders. They might win 2 games, now : )
RW may not last the season the way his O line is playing. He took a beating last night.Well, RW pulled out some magic on the last drive. Seahawks are not going anywhere this year though. They might pull this game, but . . . No extension on the RW contract yet, and he is currently sitting around 10 in terms of contracts from what I could find. Not seeing how they will hold on to him, and fix the line. But I wish they could.
Yes he did. The Seahawks are going to have to make some decisions. I don't want to go back to the days of an OK line, and just an OK Dave Krieg, Matt Hasselback kind of QB. But RW is coming up for contract extension and should be a top 10 contract if he wants. But trying to build the entire offense around his improv, when there is no protection, is not working. When it worked well, at least there was a good running game, and enough protection to get that, and some good play option plays going.RW may not last the season the way his O line is playing. He took a beating last night.
RW may not last the season the way his O line is playing. He took a beating last night.
First off, look at his numbers. https://komonews.com/sports/seahawks/seahawks-russell-wilson-ranked-no-6-in-qb-rankingsNot a regular Seahawk watcher; my impression of Wilson is that he rises to occasions, but over time he is more 'exciting' than 'efficient.' In other words, he makes a big play but then will misread a coverage on the next play and there will be an incompletion.
Is this off? Who is better than him; worse?
Agree with you about the running game. They haven't been the same since they let Marshawn go. A bit surprising since Pete Carroll has always been a "run first" type coach.Yes he did. The Seahawks are going to have to make some decisions. I don't want to go back to the days of an OK line, and just an OK Dave Krieg, Matt Hasselback kind of QB. But RW is coming up for contract extension and should be a top 10 contract if he wants. But trying to build the entire offense around his improv, when there is no protection, is not working. When it worked well, at least there was a good running game, and enough protection to get that, and some good play option plays going.
The D is doing ok, considering how many are out right now. It seems to me that the O line, and running game are the weakest areas.
Pretty interesting they were going to the aussie punter so much for even kickoffs (rather than Jankowski) last night.
Yeah, you have a point there. You can definitely tell when RW is not on. But as @shoeless says, that is more apparent as there is no running game now. And perhaps it is less apparent with a guy like Brady as Belicose and co have a good supporting cast and system around him. But I am a causal fan too, and interested primarily in my own team. So I may not have that story completely correct.The "rise to occasion" was a compliment; he has certainly outplayed Tom Brady in most of their head to head matchups. I am simply wondering why a guy who has THAT level of skill ... doesn't seem to have it 100% of the time? In other words, as an increasingly casual NFL fan, I feel that I see the same Brady / P. Manning / Rodgers / etc. on most plays. Not a lot of variance in their performance. Is there with RW? When I've seen him be good, I wind up thinking "why aren't they 14-2 with him?"
That O Line is pitiful. If I were the Seahawks, RW would be benched for his own safety until the line gets better.
The bad OL deal is part and parcel of the RW experience. He absolutely need to escape pass rushers and break contain to be consistently effective. So having free rushers losing their lanes and getting juked is optimum for the Seahawks offense, even though it seems counter-intuitive. A modern version of Doug Flutie, if you will.
I know Wilson has a good arm, good leadership, great wheels. What are his weaknesses?
No, it is worse. This year, nothing has been happening all year. And in years past, he had some help. Now, 52 last night created problems that made it look the worst I have seen it , so there is that.I get the whole run around and make plays, but I don't think Michael Vick in his prime could have broken containment in that game. Maybe their OL is the same as it ever was and Chicago's pass rush is just that good.