OMG Politics, I'm over it already.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So much stupid, surprised anything stands out but, he managed anyways.

"Julian Assange even conceded that they did not get their information from the Russians or any other nation state."

Julian Assange? You would take his word for it? Really?

"Once again Ted Nugent delivers the truth."
 
15621766_10208947493138959_1819555113805087675_n.jpg

Funny, they stole the image I always had of W and his pals.
 
That amount of chaos would be dwarfed by the damage trump is going to do.

This. The American Taliban marching through Dallas with effigies of Hillary and AR-15s is nothing compared to the civilian casualties of Trump trying to bomb ISIS out of existence. Or worse, Trump deciding to respond to North Korea with force at 3am and the rest of us waking up to the news that Seoul and Incheon are now smoking charnel pits.
 
This. The American Taliban marching through Dallas with effigies of Hillary and AR-15s is nothing compared to the civilian casualties of Trump trying to bomb ISIS out of existence. Or worse, Trump deciding to respond to North Korea with force at 3am and the rest of us waking up to the news that Seoul and Incheon are now smoking charnel pits.

OR.....dumpster kissing Vlad's ass and Red Dawn actually happening.
 
OR.....dumpster kissing Vlad's ass and Red Dawn actually happening.

That won’t happen. At some point the alt-right are going to realize that Russia is full of Slavs, dark-skinned Asians, and their mixed descendents. That will nip Trump’s Russian adventures in the bud.
 
That amount of chaos would be dwarfed by the damage trump is going to do.

Yes but giving the election to a republican other than Trump, stops Trumps destruction and the ultra right's chaos so nobody gets hurt. I wouldn't be surprised at all if some right wing nut job assassinated Clinton if the EC gives it to her.

I think we can recover from 4 years of Romney or Kasich.
 
I was just reading the washing post article on that survey

"In a nationally representative online survey of 1,011 Americans conducted by Qualtrics between Dec. 6 and 12"

1,011 people....Online. eh.

Pew Research did the same survey and found some different results:

There is a significant partisan divide in knowledge of which candidate won the popular vote. About eight-in-ten Democrats and Democratic leaners (81%) say that Clinton won the most votes nationwide, compared with a smaller 68%-majority of Republicans and Republican leaners.

http://www.people-press.org/2016/12/08/6-awareness-of-election-results/
 
I was just reading the washing post article on that survey

"In a nationally representative online survey of 1,011 Americans conducted by Qualtrics between Dec. 6 and 12"

1,011 people....Online. eh.

Pew Research did the same survey and found some different results:

There is a significant partisan divide in knowledge of which candidate won the popular vote. About eight-in-ten Democrats and Democratic leaners (81%) say that Clinton won the most votes nationwide, compared with a smaller 68%-majority of Republicans and Republican leaners.

http://www.people-press.org/2016/12/08/6-awareness-of-election-results/

It's still telling even if it's off by +/- 15%.

And it's not a topic that demands a massive sample size.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top