OMG Politics, I'm over it already.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have been paying attention. It's not me that you need to scold.

i wasn't scolding you.....just the whole thread.
the guy has been overcharging all of his campaign expenses to his corporations. he charges his 747 $10,000 an hour to the campaign. same goes for the campaign offices in the 'tower'. he is MAKING MONEY just running for office.
and he's going to run the entire country on that same premise.
 
Is it just me, or is the US making Putin out to be this incredible criminal mastermind, when he is really just sort of a punk, two-bit tyrant. I think we are giving the Rooskis way too much credit. Yeah, they can work some mischief, but they are hardly the evil empire these days.

Agreed, he’s not a successor the evil geniuses that kept communism going for decades. But Putin is willing to start World War III to project his interests—Russia props up Assad to prevent Arab Oil pipelines going into Europe. You don’t fuck with a guy who’s not afraid to end the world.
 
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. are in agreement with a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the White House, officials disclosed Friday, as President Obama issued a public warning to Moscow that it could face retaliation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ac61c0ef74d_story.html?utm_term=.0541e318e5ae

so WHEN does the election get proclaimed invalid?

if that does not happen....then all the bullshit claims mean NOTHING.
 
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. are in agreement with a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the White House, officials disclosed Friday, as President Obama issued a public warning to Moscow that it could face retaliation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ac61c0ef74d_story.html?utm_term=.0541e318e5ae


So, is Comey going to admit he's a dupe, a fellow traveler, or a useful idiot to Putin?
 
"Unpresidented"???

image.jpeg
 
so WHEN does the election get proclaimed invalid?

if that does not happen....then all the bullshit claims mean NOTHING.

I think the only situations where the results could be nullified or alter the outcome would be if voter fraud was discovered and corrected to the degree that it changes the results, congress refuses to certify the results, the electoral college voters cast a different vote than the election, or the results are challenged in court on some legal basis.

The electoral college vote is cast this Monday. There are indications that some may intend to cast a different vote than their state results but there's no expectation that there's enough 'defector' votes to alter the outcome.
 
There are indications that some may intend to cast a different vote than their state results but there's no expectation that there's enough 'defector' votes to alter the outcome.
Apparently it would only take 38 defectors going for Hillary for her to hit 270.

Could you imagine?
 
Apparently it would only take 38 defectors going for Hillary for her to hit 270.

Could you imagine?

It would be so awesome if his birth certificate was fake and he was born in Kenya. And they weren't able to prove it until 2 months away from his second term ending. I hope in his final speech, he says, "Hey everybody, I'm a Muslim." That would freaking rock.

Somehow this seems like a fitting end to this year.
 
"Liberalism is a spiritual disorder. Pity the fools, but turn them back.
From Ray DiLorenzo & StandUp America!

This election sold more antacid pills, caused more counseling appointments and maybe turned more sober liberals into drunks than any election in my lifetime. They refuse to believe it could happen in the U.S. of A. where billions of dollars and at least 50 years was spent patiently transforming the mass media, much of our federal and state bureaucracy and the entire education system into slobbering disciples of 'progressive' re-education, big government theology, political correctness and safe zones.

The left is working frantically to try to either win the election for Hillary by whatever means necessary, or to de-legitimize the Trump presidency before he even takes the oath.

The 'Russians did it' is the latest justification for their deranged rationalization and decades of mental disorder. Hardly a day goes by without Fox's Bill O'Reilly or Tucker Carlson exposing some complete nut bar liberal professor or Hollywood personality droning on about why the world is the way it is, all without ever having actually lived in it. Even Britain's Labour Party has joined in the hysteria, blaming Russia for Brexit, not their tone deafness.

The left, displaying their amnesia for all the world to see, accused Trump of having ties to Russia and forgetting that it was Secretary Clinton who approved a uranium-mining deal that gave Russia (Rosatom) and Uranium One of Canada control over much of the world's uranium. Oh, and let's not forget the $2.35 million donation from the chairman of Uranium One to the Clinton Foundation. So, who has the ties with Russia?

Yes, Putin probably preferred Trump to win the election. Russia needs to be rid of ISIS and neither Clinton nor soon-to-be former President Obama were the ones to do it. Russia desperately needs a stable Middle East for their own economy and Putin has long ago had his way with both Hillary and Obama. They have nothing more to give. That does not prove Putin had the DNC hacked. The Russians didn't need to hack the DNC.

The good judge Andrew Napolitano, much to my glee since I have said it many times in the past, recently articulated on Fox News that, more than likely, it was the intelligence community that leaked the emails to WikiLeaks. Julian Assange even conceded that they did not get their information from the Russians or any other nation state.

The United States intelligence community does not trust Clinton with state secrets. She was extremely careless in the past and they saw no reason she would be any different in the future. With enough money, one can buy just about anything from either Clinton. The lives of intelligence personnel were compromised by her actions so they weren't about to support her candidacy. Obama supported her only to protect his legacy and the Iran deal.

This story has become a 'much ado about nothing.' The left is desparately looking for any excuse for their loss and found the only scape-goat they think people might buy. What a sad commentary on our institutions that we have to depend on leaks and an alternate media to discover the truth about our own corrupt political system.


The Democratic Party is broken, no longer the party of JFK. Democrats simply ran out of altitude and ideas, or, as Thatcher so brilliantly said, "...other people's money." They made more promises than they were willing or able to keep, taxed everyone to the hilt while wanting more. And, like a snake-oil salesman in a carnival, they watched as people who had heard the same tired hawking for too many years, quietly walk away."

Once again Ted Nugent delivers the truth.
 
Apparently it would only take 38 defectors going for Hillary for her to hit 270.

Could you imagine?

As much as I despise Trump, I don't want that to happen. I'd rather Trump not get to 270 and those votes go to someone like Romney so the House votes on the top 3. I don't like Romney, but he is no Trump. I fear if the EC gives it to Hillary there would be chaos.
 
"Liberalism is a spiritual disorder. Pity the fools, but turn them back.
From Ray DiLorenzo & StandUp America!

This election sold more antacid pills, caused more counseling appointments and maybe turned more sober liberals into drunks than any election in my lifetime. They refuse to believe it could happen in the U.S. of A. where billions of dollars and at least 50 years was spent patiently transforming the mass media, much of our federal and state bureaucracy and the entire education system into slobbering disciples of 'progressive' re-education, big government theology, political correctness and safe zones.

The left is working frantically to try to either win the election for Hillary by whatever means necessary, or to de-legitimize the Trump presidency before he even takes the oath.

The 'Russians did it' is the latest justification for their deranged rationalization and decades of mental disorder. Hardly a day goes by without Fox's Bill O'Reilly or Tucker Carlson exposing some complete nut bar liberal professor or Hollywood personality droning on about why the world is the way it is, all without ever having actually lived in it. Even Britain's Labour Party has joined in the hysteria, blaming Russia for Brexit, not their tone deafness.

The left, displaying their amnesia for all the world to see, accused Trump of having ties to Russia and forgetting that it was Secretary Clinton who approved a uranium-mining deal that gave Russia (Rosatom) and Uranium One of Canada control over much of the world's uranium. Oh, and let's not forget the $2.35 million donation from the chairman of Uranium One to the Clinton Foundation. So, who has the ties with Russia?

Yes, Putin probably preferred Trump to win the election. Russia needs to be rid of ISIS and neither Clinton nor soon-to-be former President Obama were the ones to do it. Russia desperately needs a stable Middle East for their own economy and Putin has long ago had his way with both Hillary and Obama. They have nothing more to give. That does not prove Putin had the DNC hacked. The Russians didn't need to hack the DNC.

The good judge Andrew Napolitano, much to my glee since I have said it many times in the past, recently articulated on Fox News that, more than likely, it was the intelligence community that leaked the emails to WikiLeaks. Julian Assange even conceded that they did not get their information from the Russians or any other nation state.

The United States intelligence community does not trust Clinton with state secrets. She was extremely careless in the past and they saw no reason she would be any different in the future. With enough money, one can buy just about anything from either Clinton. The lives of intelligence personnel were compromised by her actions so they weren't about to support her candidacy. Obama supported her only to protect his legacy and the Iran deal.

This story has become a 'much ado about nothing.' The left is desparately looking for any excuse for their loss and found the only scape-goat they think people might buy. What a sad commentary on our institutions that we have to depend on leaks and an alternate media to discover the truth about our own corrupt political system.


The Democratic Party is broken, no longer the party of JFK. Democrats simply ran out of altitude and ideas, or, as Thatcher so brilliantly said, "...other people's money." They made more promises than they were willing or able to keep, taxed everyone to the hilt while wanting more. And, like a snake-oil salesman in a carnival, they watched as people who had heard the same tired hawking for too many years, quietly walk away."

Once again Ted Nugent delivers the truth.

So much stupid, surprised anything stands out but, he managed anyways.

"Julian Assange even conceded that they did not get their information from the Russians or any other nation state."

Julian Assange? You would take his word for it? Really?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top