just goes to show you that even the conventional 'right' has limits as to how far they're willing to go.Wow. Clinton has been gathering endorsements from papers that have never endorsed a Dem (Arizona Republic), endorsements of support from Republicans with defense ties such as John Warner, and this write up not so much endorsing Clinton as saying to stay away from Trump because he is dangerous, from W. F. Buckley's paper The National Review: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...gn-policy-nato-allies-treaties-vladimir-putin Seems like a few conservatives have had enough after last night.
just goes to show you that even the conventional 'right' has limits as to how far they're willing to go.
the fringe will always be the fringe.
Because the concept that they might have lavalier mics on both candidates for broadcast is too hard to understand we now have this conspiracy theory that Hillary was cheating with an ear piece:
:hd:
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
i disagree. seeing how many 'conventional' republicans are backing away from endorsing him or stating flat out that they are going to vote for HRC, is proof that there is a seperation.Donald J. Trump is the republican party nominee for president- I think it's safe to say that Pandora's box is wide open and what was once "fringe" is now mainstream.
i disagree. seeing how many 'conventional' republicans are backing away from endorsing him or stating flat out that they are going to vote for HRC, is proof that there is a seperation.
Trump is still claiming to have won the debate even today. He must have added a special consultant to his team.
how do you come to that conclusion. he didn't have a single cohesive sentence in the whole thing.Trump clearly won the debate....if you want to call it a debate.......
Trump clearly won the debate....if you want to call it a debate.......
just goes to show you that even the conventional 'right' has limits as to how far they're willing to go.
the fringe will always be the fringe.
and half of those are voting that way ONLY because they hate HRC. So....At least 40% of voters will be voting for a fringe candidate. So...
and half of those are voting that way ONLY because they hate HRC. So....
and half of those are voting that way ONLY because they hate HRC. So....
i absolutely agree there are far more reasons to not like/trust the Dumpster. i'm not voting for him, i'm voting against him, not necessarily FOR Hill.Assuming that to be the case....
For every reason we have to distrust or to dislike HRC, there are far more reasons to dislike Trump.
"I don't trust this person, so I'm going to support this other person who lies literally 4-5 times more often."
There is a disconnect with reality and logic in this thinking. It's about something deeper.
That said, the history of American conservatism is a history of people voting against the best interests of communities.