If you can find a good used one with a 1x11 drive train (SRAM), it saves on hassle and maintenance. Also, remember with XC bikes, that if they are too steep in the front end, you can end jump walking over the front, at least if it is a 29’er. But a good 29’er hard tail will serve well for most trails that are relatively smooth. Anything I have seen in your pics, you would be fine. That also reduces maintenance. So yeah, 1x, disc brakes, hard tail. I prefer hydraulic disc brakes and they are not that much harder to work with. You should be able to find something.after taking the P.O.S. Trek (that I paid $100 for recently in a grocery store parking lot) to intermediate trails over the weekend, I've decided to clean that up and give it to my GF's dad. He's awesome, and hikes about 3-5 miles every day (at age 70). We want him to have another option, and he's not gonna ever try anything too crazy. It should suit him just fine.
That means I get to have an NBD soon... I have a couple things in mind. Looking at XC bikes in either hardtail or limited rear suspension. Used, and not more than a decade old. Not gonna plop down a few grand, so we'll see what's out there.
As always, your insight is appreciated. I honestly don't care much about wheel size. 26, 27.5, 29, all good. And yes, hydraulic disc brakes for sure. it'll either have 1x already, or I'll convert it myself. I never strayed from the middle ring over the weekend.If you can find a good used one with a 1x11 drive train (SRAM), it saves on hassle and maintenance. Also, remember with XC bikes, that if they are too steep in the front end, you can end jump walking over the front, at least if it is a 29’er. But a good 29’er hard tail will serve well for most trails that are relatively smooth. Anything I have seen in your pics, you would be fine. That also reduces maintenance. So yeah, 1x, disc brakes, hard tail. I prefer hydraulic disc brakes and they are not that much harder to work with. You should be able to find something.
Also, I like to be at least GX maybe with some X1 (for the rear mech) in the SRAM line for component group, or XT/SLX mix in Shimano. My brakes are SLX hydraulic and are nice. Stay away from Avid hydraulics. Always having to bleed those. My Kona mountain bike has X1 rear mech in 1x11, and GX cranks, etc. and SLX brakes. Has been bomber. XT rear mech and SLX shifters would be fine too.
Shocks, well, that is a whole ‘nether thing. I think a 29’er hard tail in that sort of component range, with a RockShock Pike fork would be great, and very maintainable. And of course, people love their fox shocks though I don’t know anything about the line. My .02!
If you don’t care, just find the bike in 27.5 or 29 that is in good shape, with a good front shock, and 1x. No sense going with 26, at this point. Limited wheel and tire availability, etc. And with the slightly larger wheel, no need for a rear shock for you, and so much easier that way!As always, your insight is appreciated. I honestly don't care much about wheel size. 26, 27.5, 29, all good. And yes, hydraulic disc brakes for sure. it'll either have 1x already, or I'll convert it myself. I never strayed from the middle ring over the weekend.
The thing about 1x drive trains is that they may throw the chain if you simply remove the unused chain rings. The 1x system uses a rear derailleur that has a tension clutch to help prevent this, plus the chain ring has higher profile teeth to hold the chain in place.As always, your insight is appreciated. I honestly don't care much about wheel size. 26, 27.5, 29, all good. And yes, hydraulic disc brakes for sure. it'll either have 1x already, or I'll convert it myself. I never strayed from the middle ring over the weekend.
Yep, I've seen this. I'm guessing that my plan of shortening the chain by a couple links probably won't work.The thing about 1x drive trains is that they may throw the chain if you simply remove the unused chain rings. The 1x system uses a rear derailleur that has a tension clutch to help prevent this, plus the chain ring has higher profile teeth to hold the chain in place.
Isn't that to support the fork for shipping? Split it at the connection to remove it.Anybody familiar with this kind of plastic fork plug doohickey. Short piece on left, longer piece on right, with interlocking teeth. It's defeating my sleep deprived brain atm.
View attachment 56222 View attachment 56223
I just think you will be happier if you get a purpose built 1x, in a bike with 27.5 or 29 inch wheels, so it is modern enough. SRAM introduced its 1x in 2012 I read on the interwebz. Shimano was a good few years later.Yep, I've seen this. I'm guessing that my plan of shortening the chain by a couple links probably won't work.
Thru axle became the norm over the last several years. Though QR work, the thru axle style is said to be more secure, and a bit more rigid and less flexy, I think. As said, became the norm. I like how they are easier to put on and off, without worrying about pushing this way or that with your thumbs to align the discs in the disc brakes. Works way easier. Progress and all that.out of touch question: what happened to quick-release skewers?
I'd have to see it in person to appreciate what you're saying. maybe I'll check out a vid.Thru axle became the norm over the last several years. Though QR work, the thru axle style is said to be more secure, and a bit more rigid and less flexy, I think. As said, became the norm. I like how they are easier to put on and off, without worrying about pushing this way or that with your thumbs to align the discs in the disc brakes. Works way easier. Progress and all that.
Here ya go. These guys have great vids and info.I'd have to see it in person to appreciate what you're saying. maybe I'll check out a vid.
so, what's the biggest advantage to the larger wheel size? Cushion? Clearance?If you don’t care, just find the bike in 27.5 or 29 that is in good shape, with a good front shock, and 1x. No sense going with 26, at this point. Limited wheel and tire availability, etc. And with the slightly larger wheel, no need for a rear shock for you, and so much easier that way!
Rolls over obstacles easier, smoothes things out. Bigger is faster for XC. Most XC race bikes are 29er hard tails now it seems. But for your purposes, either 27.5 or 29 would work. With the 27.5 Plus or boost sized tires (extra fat) you get a similar diameter to a 29er, with more cushion. But then you need to get into one of those Boost spaced bikes that are in the 148mm spacing talked about in the axle vid. Probably more options for you to buy used in the 29'er hard tail category, as that has been around longer. @Tig may have some thoughts on that, but that is the way it would seem to me.so, what's the biggest advantage to the larger wheel size? Cushion? Clearance?