Dogsinplastic
avuncular to no one
Sooooo....the big Wikileaks things was nothing at all and now alt-right clowns are calling Assange a "Hillary Plant". Good times!
What was and where is the leak?
Sooooo....the big Wikileaks things was nothing at all and now alt-right clowns are calling Assange a "Hillary Plant". Good times!
In the wake of the tax return exposure, Trump's surrogates are suggesting that he is a tax genius & who better to close the loopholes than the guy who knows them inside and out?
serious question: In addition to being a "business genius" & reality TV personality, Donald Trump apparently regularly studies the federal & state tax codes in sufficient detail to be the "tax genius" he and his team have declared him to be.....do even the most staunch Trump supporters actually find this a credible claim?
What was and where is the leak?
You mean that horrid group of deplorable twits?
I think you give them too much credit in regards to intellect and related skills. These folks don't give a crap about anything that isn't going to make 'merica great aggin!
We can only hope all of this lands Trump in jail for tax evasion.
I have to chime in on the tax thing. I loathe Trump, but he didn't do anything wrong/unethical/illegal regarding his taxes. Businesses declare losses, and they spread those losses over a period of years to lessen (or eliminate) their tax burden. If Trump had an S corp., he'd pay himself a salary, and that would be taxed as income. He's probably an LLC, so he takes a shareholder's draw instead, which wouldn't be taxed as income. The media and Clinton continuing to pound away on this issue is stupid. There are plenty of valid reasons to go after Trump; this isn't one of them.
Now, the fact that he lost almost a billion dollars in one year, OTOH, is a pretty fucking big red flag if he's supposed to be such a great business guy.
well....as far as the 'legal' part....that kind of depends on how the valuation of the losses were arrived at. if the vaulation of losses were grossly exaggerated....then that's FRAUD!!
Well, sure. So someone needs to find out about that. But that's not what the press and the Clinton campaign are talking about. It's all about, "He didn't pay taxes for 18 years... wah!" It's yet another instance of oversimplification and knee-jerk idiocy.well....as far as the 'legal' part....that kind of depends on how the valuation of the losses were arrived at. if the vaulation of losses were grossly exaggerated....then that's FRAUD!!
why is it ok for him to call veterans weak for experiencing ptsd when the lazy coward hasn't served a day in his life?
It's rather a new low for our developmentally challenged congress.I didn't think this kind of stuff was allowed over here. But I'm glad it's hear because while sifting through all the Trump News Dandruff, a lot of people missed an historical event.
Step 1: Write a Bill called the 9/11 remembrance Act (or something like that) that allows us 'murricans to sue those Saudi bastards for 9/11.
Step 2: Push it through the house and senate in a matter of weeks. Have everyone vote for it because they don't want to be remembered for voting against a 9/11 bill.
Step 3: Present it to the President, who immediately vetoes it, stating "This opens the US to lawsuits to any citizen of a foreign country.
Step 4: Override the Veto in two days because Obama is a Muslim.
Step 5: Realize what you've done and then blame Obama for not talking about it earlier. HE VETOED IT!!!
Yah, pretty interesting there is no real coverage, other than what I heard on NPR.I didn't think this kind of stuff was allowed over here. But I'm glad it's hear because while sifting through all the Trump News Dandruff, a lot of people missed an historical event.
Step 1: Write a Bill called the 9/11 remembrance Act (or something like that) that allows us 'murricans to sue those Saudi bastards for 9/11.
Step 2: Push it through the house and senate in a matter of weeks. Have everyone vote for it because they don't want to be remembered for voting against a 9/11 bill.
Step 3: Present it to the President, who immediately vetoes it, stating "This opens the US to lawsuits to any citizen of a foreign country.
Step 4: Override the Veto in two days because Obama is a Muslim.
Step 5: Realize what you've done and then blame Obama for not talking about it earlier. HE VETOED IT!!!
Well, sure. So someone needs to find out about that. But that's not what the press and the Clinton campaign are talking about. It's all about, "He didn't pay taxes for 18 years... wah!" It's yet another instance of oversimplification and knee-jerk idiocy.