Help!I'maRock!
Mediocringly Derivative
Seems like it's 268 years early.
It doesn't have to be like this, humpback whales.
Seems like it's 268 years early.
Incorrect. The FCC determines the frequencies at which each channel is transmitted over coax, not only because of standardization reasons (CableCARD, DOCSIS, interoperability between the same models of cable box between providers, etc.) but because of radio frequencies induced by the data at those frequencies over the line potentially causing interference.
Cable gets a pass on language and such because it's a subscription service and thus not something broadcast OTA and thus not something you can accidentally end up watching.
It's always interesting to see perspectives. This is a person that I like in everyday life and get along with pretty well. Because of that I choose not to talk politics with him. This was a post on a gun argument today:
View attachment 41014
This goes against everything I've read and learned and discussed over the last few years. I'm trying to figure out what he thinks "center" really is?
This guy is probably in his early 60's, seems to identify as a Libertarian more than anything else, works for some manner of petroleum/lubricant company in a tech or scientific role and is a climate change denier. And if you met him on the street with no access to Facebook he would probably fit in just fine on the forum.Someone who obviously knows nothing about Reagan's policies. Which I find is quite common today, Republicans who only recently became interested in politics, educated by Fox news or worse, and know nothing about Republican politics historically.
It's always interesting to see perspectives. This is a person that I like in everyday life and get along with pretty well. Because of that I choose not to talk politics with him. This was a post on a gun argument today:
View attachment 41014
This goes against everything I've read and learned and discussed over the last few years. I'm trying to figure out what he thinks "center" really is?
Someone who obviously knows nothing about Reagan's policies. Which I find is quite common today, Republicans who only recently became interested in politics, educated by Fox news or worse, and know nothing about Republican politics historically.
This guy is probably in his early 60's, seems to identify as a Libertarian more than anything else, works for some manner of petroleum/lubricant company in a tech or scientific role and is a climate change denier. And if you met him on the street with no access to Facebook he would probably fit in just fine on the forum.
I think that everything I knew about people before last year is mostly invalid.
Freeburty, y'all:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...w-alaska-bear-hunting-doughnuts-bacon-n876306
Interior Dept. moves to allow Alaska bear hunting with doughnuts, bacon
You know what I like about Michael Avenatti? You lie and he shits in your mouth on Twitter within minutes: http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...ts-then-deletes-fox-news-bookers-phone-number
Freeburty, y'all:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...w-alaska-bear-hunting-doughnuts-bacon-n876306
Interior Dept. moves to allow Alaska bear hunting with doughnuts, bacon
Everything he says there is demonstrably bullshit. And if he truly believes it, he is a fucking idiot.It's always interesting to see perspectives. This is a person that I like in everyday life and get along with pretty well. Because of that I choose not to talk politics with him. This was a post on a gun argument today:
View attachment 41014
This goes against everything I've read and learned and discussed over the last few years. I'm trying to figure out what he thinks "center" really is?
Avenatti is a scumbag, but he's the scumbag we need right now.You know what I like about Michael Avenatti? You lie and he shits in your mouth on Twitter within minutes: http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...ts-then-deletes-fox-news-bookers-phone-number