Funnily enough up until quite recent, LoB was banned in Britain
The film was a huge box-office success, earning the fourth-highest takings in the UK in 1979, and the highest for any British film in the US that year.
Less amusingly, it wasn't. (Except, oddly, in Truro and apparently also Torbay. But notably rare nutter councils apart, it wasn't.):
Here in the Netherlands, the local children get their presents from Sinterklaas (no relation, hem hem) and irritate my son by claiming that Santa Claus (who gives them nothing) couldn't possibly be real because flying reindeer. Our household orthodoxy is that the two (clearly entirely unrelated) white-bearded-and-red-robed benefactors have exclusive rights in their respective territories and by the way Sinterklaas has a horse that can reach every roof in the Netherlands in the course of a single night so maybe let's keep the sunlight off of ALL of the magics, OK?
(We sail for Eng-ger-lnd on Friday night.)
Me being a Dutchman in the UK, have to tell my daughter Sinterklaas/St Nicolaas and Santa Claus are the same person, just visiting different countries on different dates.
Aw, I do actually miss the parade of controversial helpers a bit. Only remember it vaguely as I moved to England when I was but a toddlerI bow to your Backstory Reconciliation Engine! My children are very picky about The Lore which clearly states that Sinterklaas lives in Espain and comes by boat (with a horse and some Controversial Helpers), while Santa lives at the North Pole and has flying reindeer and a staff of Uncontroversial Elves.
Anyway, Santa only brings minor presents; the real Christmas presents are from named individuals, and there are (thankfully) no Piss-Poor Pomes to go with them.
Ive been there for whatever the thing is where they black their faces up. It was brilliant.
I read about some party poopers last year in Amsterdam trying to get it banned. Bloody pc killjoys.
Ive been there for whatever the thing is where they black their faces up. It was brilliant.
I read about some party poopers last year in Amsterdam trying to get it banned. Bloody pc killjoys.
yesw, because protesting outdated quasi-racist stereotypes from colonial times is being a 'pc killjoy'.
FYI, in an effort to make it acceptable for all, one mayor proposed to instead use 'rainbow' Petes. He received death threats
As far as I remember it, it was a lot of kids having a good time. There was nothing 'racist' about it. So wind your neck in.
Plus apparently the vast majority of your countrymen don't think its racist either, according to the news. No need to get your knickers in a twist.
I was under the impression that Zwarte Piet – much like similar traditions in Europe and older ones in Britain – represented miners, rather than 'natives'.The whole origin of Zwarte Piet in itself is racist, not saying there is any racist intent in the celebrations. A tradition is not in itself a reason it is always acceptable.
And what most people think is not necessarily a good indication of facts.
It is sometimes claimed that they got so black from coming down all of the chimneys. This is transparently a retcon, but I am otherwise fine with it. This year's TV version, they actually showed the process as a bunch of new recruits were trained, and there were also ome white-face clown Pieten and in the big reveal at the finale, the retired Piet who'd come back to help run the show was promoted to be a Sinterklaas in his own right.I was under the impression that Zwarte Piet – much like similar traditions in Europe and older ones in Britain – represented miners, rather than 'natives'.
Happy to be corrected in this though
I was under the impression that Zwarte Piet – much like similar traditions in Europe and older ones in Britain – represented miners, rather than 'natives'.
Happy to be corrected in this though