This!Democrats are not bleeding-heart liberals, they are centrists. The GOP is borderline fascist. The problem is that America isn’t aware of this.
Yes, to an extent, I agree. In some areas more (I would say much more) what would be traditionally labeled as "left" is needed. But labeling stuff as left, or further left or far left, and the same things on the right to me is both inaccurate in terms of discussion of, and identification of, policies aimed at solving or at least improving or dealing with, oncoming issues. Even saying it is purple instead of red and blue is not helpful. Identifying an issue, getting data and science, discussing possible solutions, getting laws made if necessary to accomplish, are not as simple as a color chart or setting on a balance knob.This!
This!
This!
It cannot be said enough--the US does not have a left in national politics. It desperately needs one.
Certainly, the issues are more important than the labels. But the labels are a large stumbling block. Democrats are so afraid of being labeled "liberal" or "leftist" that they've basically become Republican-lite. Obama is a centrist; Hillary is practically a neo-con. But because the Republican party has been allowed to frame the narrative for so long (and the entire party has moved from conservative to bat-shit wingnut), the Republican base dismisses anything left of far-right as socialism/communism/America-hating/God-hating/etc. The Democratic party needs many more Bernies (though not actually a dem) and Elizabeth Warrens, who will actually stand up for the liberal policies the party is supposed to espouse. I think the voters crave it--young people, minorities, women, LGBTQ, atheists/free-thinkers, etc. I truly believe Bernie would have won the general election had he gotten the nomination. Every time Democrats lose big, they say, "We have to move to the center, work with our Republican colleagues, blah blah." No, they need to move way left and commit to it.Yes, to an extent, I agree. In some areas more (I would say much more) what would be traditionally labeled as "left" is needed. But labeling stuff as left, or further left or far left, and the same things on the right to me is both inaccurate in terms of discussion of, and identification of, policies aimed at solving or at least improving or dealing with, oncoming issues. Even saying it is purple instead of red and blue is not helpful. Identifying an issue, getting data and science, discussing possible solutions, getting laws made if necessary to accomplish, are not as simple as a color chart or setting on a balance knob.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/paul-manafort-is-going-to-jail?source=articles&via=rssBreaking News:
Federal judge jails ex-Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort ahead of trial
this "tremendous border security" and " we need the wall".....isn't this exactly what East Germany did after WWII?https://thinkprogress.org/trump-lie...-his-face-and-kept-lying-anyway-d1a52029dbcb/
Reporters fact-check Trump on family separation to his face, Trump keeps lying anyway
"I hate the children being taken away. The Democrats need to change their law."
this "tremendous border security" and " we need the wall".....isn't this exactly what East Germany did after WWII?
Because it will reduce the overall size of his prison butthole gape.https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/poli...utm_term=4d3d0c1d-b0b2-4431-af6f-ee066cc7fb04
Cohen signals openness to cooperating with federal investigators
Breaking News:
Federal judge jails ex-Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort ahead of trial
Had come here to post that just after sleewell, but my computer was too slow. Here is the NYT link I was going to post.
This is part of my point above. At a certain level, or after a certain point, legal standards still apply. The rule of law is not dead completely, at least not yet. Conspiracy theory-esque opinions do not generally matter before federal and/or state judges.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/us/politics/manafort-bail-revoked-jail.html
Breaking News:
Federal judge jails ex-Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort ahead of trial
He's a problem -- and a big one -- but he's not the problem. The problem is something like "treating stupidity as though its has the same value as non-stupidity" or "giving objectively vile positions anything except ridicule and scorn in the public forum".
This is silly. Trump is a problem, but to act as if partisan rancor and inside Capitol Hill baseball aren’t longstanding issues is foolish.
I’ll even venture as far as to say there is a “Deep State” of lifelong bureaucrats, semi-private lobbying interests, big donors, and clandestine elements within the military and intelligence apparatuses that direct policy but who are not directly accountable.
Trump is bad, but Trump is not the cause of and solution to all of life’s problems.
Most pols simply make sure to cloak their cruelty and duplicity in contradiction and waffling. They don’t start out building concentration camps. They do bad things and then act like it was the weather and how could we have known.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/1993/01/15/world/clinton-says-us-will-continue-ban-on-haitian-exodus.html