Technically, you can polish a turd, Anderson.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It might have something to do with a candidate/major media figure (Trump) giving credence to fears/paranoia/tinfoil-hat-stuff about people being screwed over by elites/space lizards which might prompt angry people to "defend their liberties" at the polls.
Just because we regard the conspiratorial worldview of the Trump campaign as wacky doesn't mean that it isn't powerfully real for many of our well-armed neighbors.
I cannot speak for everyone, but I believe the point is that if he does not concede and accept the loss as legitimate, and complain further that it is rigged and that he should be President, his followers could be egged on to any number of shenanigans such as attempted rebellion, violent protests, etc. And at the polls, before the election is over, the concern is that his "poll watchers" could cause some sort of trouble or violence, or intimidate minority voters from even coming to the polls. And the connection between all of this and his statement last night, is that it fuels those flames. The traditional answer is that "of course I will accept the will of the people as expressed by the vote."Ok, so someone explain what happens if Trump doesn't accept the election results, whether it's a landslide for Hillary (it will be) or not? Does time stop and the country goes into perpetual POTUS limbo? I'm confused why this is even an issue. It's a speculative dead end.
I cannot speak for everyone, but I believe the point is that if he does not concede and accept the loss as legitimate, and complain further that it is rigged and that he should be President, his followers could be egged on to any number of shenanigans such as attempted rebellion, violent protests, etc. And at the polls, before the election is over, the concern is that his "poll watchers" could cause some sort of trouble or violence, or intimidate minority voters from even coming to the polls. And the connection between all of this and his statement last night, is that it fuels those flames. The traditional answer is that "of course I will accept the will of the people as expressed by the vote."
This is my hope, and that more GOP'ers and even the radically whacky conservatives within their ranks distance themselves from his defiance.Or, his campaign staff will realize the paychecks are going to stop coming in and leave him...and he'll revert back to firing off withering tweets that nobody really cares about and nobody will touch him with a 10' pole ever again.
EDIT: further to your question above and why it is important: Historically, the peaceful transition between presidential administrations is a hall mark of what is good about our country and government. It was noted by Europe after our early elections, as noted last night by the debate commentator Cokie Roberts on ABC last night.Ok, so someone explain what happens if Trump doesn't accept the election results, whether it's a landslide for Hillary (it will be) or not? Does time stop and the country goes into perpetual POTUS limbo? I'm confused why this is even an issue. It's a speculative dead end.
our first election when Jefferson defeated Adams
That seems to me, um, slightly revisionistic.
That seems to me, um, slightly revisionistic.
Nope, just wrong.