I don't know if you are serious or not but there is some validity to your post. "Back In The Day" it was Ferrari and (on and off again), renault-remember those turbos in the late 70's-early 80's? (Quick but broke down if you looked at them wrong), Cosworth, sometimes Matra, etc...I think they should mandate that any team without an engine supplier worked out by October 1 has to run a Cosworth DFV or a Judd v8.
Later it was Judd, BMW (Megatron)and the like, but the likely hood was that if you were one of the privateer teams you could have a relatively competetive Cosworth in your car and race to win.
Now you are merely field filler so that F1 does not look like the farce it seems to be: One or two teams that are really competetive and the rest just there so the track has more than four cars on it. Cannot be a spectacle of racing if only two teams are entered.
I blame, rightly or not, Eccelstone. Sure, he brought money into the sport but I do not remember it being so....Boring like it is now.
It would be nice if a company like Cosworth, with no affiliation to any marque, could be an engine supplier. Then there would not be an issue of top-tier v. "you just get to make the grid" engines as Cosworth would not have any allegiance to just one team. They would provide the same engines to anyone who wanted one.
As it is now you either sail the failboat like McLaren is doing, or get stuck with underpowered customer engines from the top-tier teams. No way to compete at all.
I am liking F1 less and less as time goes by. It is, IMO, losing it's relevance due to its seeming favoritism to certain teams, and Eccelstone's hubris.