I haven't seen a Huracan on the road yet, which is weird because Gallardos are an almost daily sighting. I'm curious to see if they look as bland in person as they do in pictures. Not to say it isn't striking, because it is. It just seems to lack some of the usual Lamborghini definition and bold ques. It's almost too refined and sleek looking if you know what I mean. There is nothing gawdy or outrageous about it that is quintessential Lamborghini styling insanity.
It shares more styling cues with a Prius than it does with a Countach.
I'd still take one in a heartbeat too.
Good points. I can't disagree for the most part other than to say that both the Gallardo and the Aventador SCREAM "look at me! I'm a Lamborghini! " as where the Huracan is much more subdued.I've seen two in person now (both red) — the one last night and the one at the Italian car show in Denver a few weeks back. I think it's a much better looking car than the Gallardo and it's far more attractive than an Aventador, but I agree there's a certain generic quality. McLarens suffer from the same issue IMHO. Still, the Huracan has great presence in a way that the Gallardo never did for me.
They sold the Red one, this one might actually be more beautiful.
It definitely looks much better in person. It does have some odd dimensions, but the entirety of it simply works.Another example of a car that (in my opinion) doesn't photograph well. The one I saw in Denver was gorgeous.
Weren't they usually made by a company called Cragar?The style of those wheels on that Duster is the generic image in my head for "mag wheels." That particular design is iconic.
Weren't they usually made by a company called Cragar?
Yeah. I was trying to remember who most famously made those other ones with the oval cutouts.