OMG Politics, I'm over it already.

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/trump-russia-classified-information/index.html?adkey=bn

Throughout the 2016 campaign, Trump slammed Hillary Clinton for storing classified information on her private email server.

"Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team 'were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,' Trump tweeted in July. "Not fit!"

Private email server is not good, but it seems a lot better than sharing classified information with a Russian government official in a closed door meeting where the American press was not allowed but the Russian media was.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/trump-russia-classified-information/index.html?adkey=bn

Throughout the 2016 campaign, Trump slammed Hillary Clinton for storing classified information on her private email server.

"Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team 'were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,' Trump tweeted in July. "Not fit!"

Private email server is not good, but it seems a lot better than sharing classified information with a Russian government official in a closed door meeting where the American press was not allowed but the Russian media was.
#notfakenews

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0c172a-3960-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...p-revealed-highly-classified-info-to-russians


O0UjOJZ.jpg
 
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/trump-russia-classified-information/index.html?adkey=bn

Throughout the 2016 campaign, Trump slammed Hillary Clinton for storing classified information on her private email server.

"Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team 'were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,' Trump tweeted in July. "Not fit!"

Private email server is not good, but it seems a lot better than sharing classified information with a Russian government official in a closed door meeting where the American press was not allowed but the Russian media was.

This might be nothing. One thing that came out of the Clinton email scandal was that the state department was regularly classifying information that did not need to be. When I worked in intel fifteen years ago I was told to carefully guard SCI governments secrets. Many of those big secrets had been already documented online by watchdog groups but the bureaucrats never got around to lifting the classifications.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/trump-russia-classified-information/index.html?adkey=bn

Throughout the 2016 campaign, Trump slammed Hillary Clinton for storing classified information on her private email server.

"Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team 'were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,' Trump tweeted in July. "Not fit!"

Private email server is not good, but it seems a lot better than sharing classified information with a Russian government official in a closed door meeting where the American press was not allowed but the Russian media was.

TWO russian officials. there were two in the room, at the time.
 
This might be nothing. One thing that came out of the Clinton email scandal was that the state department was regularly classifying information that did not need to be. When I worked in intel fifteen years ago I was told to carefully guard SCI governments secrets. Many of those big secrets had been already documented online by watchdog groups but the bureaucrats never got around to lifting the classifications.

i worked in intel in the 70's, so been there too. anyway....just because someone or media release classified material on line (or where ever), that's no reason to declassify it. it could still be classified regardless of who illegally published it. just sayin'
 
Last edited:
This doesn't surprise me at all that it was passed on to her employer. What does surprise me is that an employee of her rank and position would take part in an activist roll that would allow her to be identified as such. I'm sorry but that's a stupid move on her part particularly since she worked at a bank. You can get all gun-ho on this protesting shit if you wish thinking you have all these rights to protect you. They do in a sense, the the government can't arrest you but they don't give shit about that anyway. It's to easy to kick you where it really hurts and that's in every state.
 
This doesn't surprise me at all that it was passed on to her employer. What does surprise me is that an employee of her rank and position would take part in an activist roll that would allow her to be identified as such. I'm sorry but that's a stupid move on her part particularly since she worked at a bank. You can get all gun-ho on this protesting shit if you wish thinking you have all these rights to protect you. They do in a sense, the the government can't arrest you but they don't give shit about that anyway. It's to easy to kick you where it really hurts and that's in every state.


Well, yeah. If you're going to do something publicly you then need to be able to stand by it. The congresscritter is still a piece of shit though.
 
I can't wait to see what trump tweets about this latest thing in a few hours. Is it possible to foam at the mouth in a tweet? We'll find out pretty soon.
 
I bet he will resort to the Hillary classified emails thing.

Millions of emails. So much classified stuff. It makes one off hand comment to some Russian diplomats seem like nothing. She should be in prison. That is why I fired Comey. So bad.

ok....so YOU'RE the one advising cheeto on what to tweet? :grin:
 
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/trump-russia-classified-information/index.html?adkey=bn

Throughout the 2016 campaign, Trump slammed Hillary Clinton for storing classified information on her private email server.

"Crooked Hillary Clinton and her team 'were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,' Trump tweeted in July. "Not fit!"

Private email server is not good, but it seems a lot better than sharing classified information with a Russian government official in a closed door meeting where the American press was not allowed but the Russian media was.

I actually think a private server, provided it is secure and locked down, would be better than the official server. The people trying to hack it, know it's there. I mean they are looking for hclinton@secretaryofstate.gov but they probably aren't looking for cigarhater@gmail.com
 
I actually think a private server, provided it is secure and locked down, would be better than the official server.

Definitely. It’s not a secret that important government networks are riddled with Windows XP installs. The NSA and CIA can’t even keep their networks secure. Clinton would literally have been better off letting a high school kid build her a server running OpenBSD. The real problem isn’t that her email server was private. It’s that she still had government people build it instead of competent outsiders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top