Flamencology
You don't deserve koa.
Something like that
A lot of people would say that that's pretty, um, stupid. But I didn't say it.
Something like that
I mean, it's very creative use of effects I guess but this style of music just doesn't do anything for me. It sounds like rehashed 80's techno-pop. I didn't like it 30 years ago and I suppose I still don't.
who is the Of Montreal that you speak? I know and like all the other bands you mentioned, but never heard of them
Meh,A lot of people would say that that's pretty, um, stupid. But I didn't say it.
On that subject I hate the algorithms that Pandora uses. Just because I like Wilco and Bon Iver doesn't mean I like Iron and Wine. But the damn program kept putting on Iron and Wine songs, which I rejected every time. And then I guess I exceeded the number of rejections I could enter - so it still kept on putting up Iron and Wine songs like HAL in 2001. I nearly died.
Then he's limiting the parameters in order to fit his preconceived thesis. He asked for an example of a smart and insightful music critic, and I provided one who's brilliant enough to settle his scepticism. Unless popular music is somehow beyond investigation, for whatever reason.
No, I didn't make it to the Sabbath rave up. But I got almost there. I stopped because the whole song was the same droning riff..... over and over and Over and over and....I guess you didn't make it to the Black Sabbath rave-up that kicks in at the 30 mark. Or maybe you did. Whatever...
Don't be in a hurry to grow old, bro.
Embrace the new.
Buy the album of the band you've never heard of.
Go to the show where you don't know any of the songs.
When you were 20 years old and feeling the passion, nostalgic crusty old dudes were calling all your favorite bands "rehashed". And they were wrong.
Don't be that guy. The only way to be young is to be young right now and be young tomorrow. Rise to it.
Or be a Dylan nerd...
Well I couldn't come up with a modern popular music critic worth reading myself, but I'd like to think they're still out there. It's fairly easy to come up with great music critics in the jazz and classical fields. I grew up reading Lester Bangs (not saying he was great, of course because I did like prog rock back then) and Robert Hilburn in the LA Times (and syndicated). And of course Martin Williams and Leonard Feather in the jazz field.
Today if I need a short synopsis of an artist and their discography I usually go to all music.com. They were originally a for print publication before the advent of internet, but their online site is pretty good.
In short, rock critics are a necessary evil. At their best, they provide entertainment and insight. Even when bad, they provide a perspective to sharpen your own opinion against.