This is glorious music. You may disagree, but be prepared to face my wrath.

When I have negative thoughts about jazz..this is usually what I'm hearing. I appreciate the intensity and chops..but don't enjoy the tunes. :shrug:
 

When I have negative thoughts about jazz..this is usually what I'm hearing. I appreciate the intensity and chops..but don't enjoy the tunes. :shrug:

flamethrower.jpg
 
oh, I know.
what I really meant was that if chaos had a sound, I imagine it to be along these lines.
know what I mean?
 
nature's too laid back for my tastes....:wink:

My definition of nature, in this instance, extends to Manhattan.

But chaos is the absence of design, and the sum of all variables. "Taste" doesn't factor into it. If you liked every moment of sound that chaos threw at you, you'd be the most indiscriminate listener in history.
 
Last edited:
and I might be...:wink:

perhaps cacophony would have been a better word.

and though I've never been, I'm pretty sure I'd classify Manhattan as chaotic.:grin:
 
When I have negative thoughts about jazz..this is usually what I'm hearing. I appreciate the intensity and chops..but don't enjoy the tunes. :shrug:

I had to laugh the first time I heard Ornette Coleman because it sounded exactly like I did when I would make fun of jazz.
 
I think that chaos does have a sound, and it's the sound of nature. :)

...thats not the kind of track you try and convince a bunch of jazznorants is glorious...you have to start small with jazz, and work your way in...

...try this...I bet you'll scoff at it...but I think people round these parts could dig this more...



...of you listen to this...hold out for the guitar solo...great tone...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like the part where he pretends to be a Turkey Gobbler and then goes right into a 1950s police siren caught in some serious Doppler effect.
 
Back
Top