Let's Have a Funny Pic Thread! Mk 46

Status
Not open for further replies.
314403909_434439438869447_9187624710609569707_n.jpg
 
GomezAddams said:
I assumed this was photoshopped when I saw it, but apparently it is legit. A 17 string bass.
315303196_675414817345680_3002397843511402765_n.jpg
Click to expand...
While watching the video, I couldn’t help thinking that he could remove a dozen or so strings and just keep the few on the bottom of the neck and one from the top.
That’d be a weird setup, but probably more practical.

But then it wouldn’t be ZZTop.


Edit: It was a “hold my beer” moment and pretty much a gag.
https://ultimateclassicrock.com/zz-top-bass/
 
PunkKitty said:
315411576_590506166454720_3568018413455510580_n.jpg
Click to expand...
The problem is that this assumes Musk bought Twitter for business reasons. People mistakenly believe that $44B is so much money that Musk must have had good reason to buy. As I mentioned in another post, he could throw Twitter in the dump and still be tied for the richest person on earth. Musk could have bought twitter as a disposable means to some unknown end. Or maybe it was just a lark.

One thing we know, you cannot analyze Musk by normal rules.
 
GomezAddams said:
The problem is that this assumes Musk bought Twitter for business reasons. People mistakenly believe that $44B is so much money that Musk must have had good reason to buy. As I mentioned in another post, he could throw Twitter in the dump and still be tied for the richest person on earth. Musk could have bought twitter as a disposable means to some unknown end. Or maybe it was just a lark.

One thing we know, you cannot analyze Musk by normal rules.
Click to expand...
That's good, because by normal rules he's a spoiled dunce spending family money and government subsidies to make the world worse on purpose.
 
GomezAddams said:
How do you figure Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink are making the world worse?
Click to expand...
If he's the numb nuts he repeatedly demonstrates himself to be, it'd be foolish to give him the credit for all the hard work his employees have done in the face of his abuse. But I was referring to the world being worse because he destroyed, over the course of two weeks, the platform used by disenfranchised groups to organize actual democratic revolutions.
 
GomezAddams said:
The problem is that this assumes Musk bought Twitter for business reasons. People mistakenly believe that $44B is so much money that Musk must have had good reason to buy. As I mentioned in another post, he could throw Twitter in the dump and still be tied for the richest person on earth. Musk could have bought twitter as a disposable means to some unknown end. Or maybe it was just a lark.

One thing we know, you cannot analyze Musk by normal rules.
Click to expand...

He needs a write off?
 
Chicken Man said:
If he's the numb nuts he repeatedly demonstrates himself to be, it'd be foolish to give him the credit for all the hard work his employees have done in the face of his abuse.
Click to expand...

I think the Twitter takeover has shown that Musk isn’t good at running companies. He’s good at hiring people to run companies for him. But he thinks he’s good at running companies because the media says he is. At Twitter he decided to use his God given management genius and it went to shit in a week. If he had spent that time hiring new executives Twitter might be on a path towards fiscal sanity (if that’s possible; it might not be possible for Twitter to keep the lights on).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top