I agree that Led Zeppelin used, borrowed and stole a lot of their ideas from blues artists. They weren't the only ones. The majority of rock bands in that era did. They definitely highjacked the Stairway to Heaven riff. That said, no other bands sounded like Led Zeppelin in their hey day. The ideas they took sounded nothing like the originals after they had been 'Zeppified'. They had 8 records in a row with no filler tunes. To compare a band that 'Gretta Van Fleeted' The Beatles for all of their 2 hits is ludicrous. You may as well compare Oasis to Black Sabbath.There are 2 rock ‘n’ roll bands that come to mind for being hugely successful while plagiarizing a lot of their musical ideas, Led Zeppelin and Oasis. Of course, they aren’t the only bands who’ve stolen ideas, but they are 2 that became very popular while stealing ideas from a wide variety of artists.
Oasis and Zeppelin are only similar in the way they plagiarized entire song ideas while coming up with new lyrics, all while becoming hugely popular worldwide. In Zep’s case, they even plagiarized lyrics in a few instances. Otherwise, they are not comparably similar. But, I never suggested that they were musically, nor lyrically, similar.To compare a band that 'Gretta Van Fleeted' The Beatles for all of their 2 hits is ludicrous. You may as well compare Oasis to Black Sabbath.
I consider Led Zeppelin to be one on the biggest bands to ever exist. I'm not alone in this thought. There's no way they stole 8 records, or anywhere near that, worth of material. And yes, "they wrote half of the riffs ever". If you want to compare a band to them, even for negative purposes, please use a more worthy band than Oasis. They were a dime a dozen MTV band back in the day. If there was a huge, Led Zeppelin size phenomenon surrounding them, I missed that boat.Oasis and Zeppelin are only similar in the way they plagiarized entire song ideas while coming up with new lyrics, all while becoming hugely popular worldwide. In Zep’s case, they even plagiarized lyrics in a few instances. Otherwise, they are not comparably similar. But, I never suggested that they were musically, nor lyrically, similar.
Greta Van Fleet stole riffs and the Zep aesthetic. They did not plagiarize entire musical ideas. They ripped fragments. The problem is that they relied too heavily on one source for their inspiration, so they ended up sounding like a cheap copy of the original. Now, that they’ve split off into other projects, perhaps they’ll get a wider variety influence in other directions and create some truly unique music.
Of course, other bands plagiarize and have plagiarized. I said as much. But, few bands have become popular throughout the world while doing it. As I mentioned, “Everything Is A Remix.” Every band stands on the shoulders of giants. All art and technology builds on what came before.
I like Zep better than Oasis. Yet, both bands stole entire musical song ideas from a variety of sources.
If we’re going to complain about bands who borrowed ideas from the Beatles, the list will get long. But, how many of them were a huge success?
Burt Bacharach took it as a compliment when Noel Gallagher ripped off the music from one of his songs to create an Oasis song. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Coca-Cola was not flattered and took legal action for Noel lifting from their jingle.
Your stanning of Zep is noted. Your distaste for Oasis is obvious.I consider Led Zeppelin to be one on the biggest bands to ever exist. I'm not alone in this thought. There's no way they stole 8 records, or anywhere near that, worth of material. And yes, "they wrote half of the riffs ever". If you want to compare a band to them, even for negative purposes, please use a more worthy band than Oasis. They were a dime a dozen MTV band back in the day. If there was a huge, Led Zeppelin size phenomenon surrounding them, I missed that boat.
Silly and self-indulgent pretty much sums up the 70s.Your stanning of Zep is noted. Your distaste for Oasis is obvious.
Zep was a great band that created great music. Even their plagiarism songs brought those tunes to greater heights. I’m a fan. Yet, as @bsman posted, “…that doesn't mean I think they're beyond reproach musically. and they are frequently silly and self-indulgent.”