That hat is like a criminal offense to me. It says "don't take me or anything I do seriously". The look of a band is as important if not more important than the songs or the sound. You'd never see that hat on the head of a band member in a band worth listening to, that is all I am really saying. I don't think anyone can argue with that.Back in the mid- to late-70s Cheap Trick played in Madison all the time (Rockford, the band's hometown is < 1.5hrs away), and having seen them numerous times at bars (mostly The Stone Hearth, which was crawling distance from Sellery Hall, my dorm at UW freshman year) there I can attest that their energy was unmatched by most other bands of that era. Also, Smurfco is obviously clueless - apparently believing that rockers have to LOOK like rockers. I found (and still find) it refreshing that a band can be un-telegenic and still be great, but I guess there will always be those shallow types who are more into "the look" than the sound....
This is the internet, everyone can argue with everything.I don't think anyone can argue with that.
It's not about wearing odd things, it is about that hat specifically. It just doesn't fly, and it ruins the band for anyone with an ounce of sense.This is the internet, everyone can argue with everything.
I'm not a big fan, but can appreciate their talent. Wearing odd things is not unusual; look at AC/DC. (Hell, I've been known to wear some odd things myself. Ask Jelloman about my boots.)
Those boots are so YOU!This is the internet, everyone can argue with everything.
I'm not a big fan, but can appreciate their talent. Wearing odd things is not unusual; look at AC/DC. (Hell, I've been known to wear some odd things myself. Ask Jelloman about my boots.)
A good band that is too clever by half.
He went bald very early. It wasn't easy being a rocker in the 70's and 80's with a horse shoe hairdoo.
See: The Edge
![]()
That's certainly an element.
I don't know this for a fact but I always interpreted Nielsen's shtick as a sort of smarmy, smart-alecky middle finger to all of the bloated, pretentious crap that dominated the era when Cheap Trick emerged. It was funny and it was a sort of solidarity with the punk movement, and it wasn't craven or mercenary (or stupid) in the way that Kiss were. And if anyone thinks the juxtaposition of Nielsen and Carlos with Zander and Petersson—the gorgeous long-haired rock gods—was an accident, they're mistaken. It was clever and it was deliberate.
Cheap Trick were/are much more sophisticated than they get credit for. They're often dismissed as a power ballad band by folks who only remember their 80s stuff and that's unfortunate. I tend to think of Nielsen as Jeff Lynne with a punk streak. Great pop sensibility and a trove of interesting ideas.
They’ve been around a long time, I think that’s part of the key to their longevity.
To me, the hat was a huge F-U to the overwrought stadium act bands of the day. It was on purpose, IMO. And I loved it.That hat is like a criminal offense to me. It says "don't take me or anything I do seriously". The look of a band is as important if not more important than the songs or the sound. You'd never see that hat on the head of a band member in a band worth listening to, that is all I am really saying. I don't think anyone can argue with that.
that's what I came here to postThere was a teenage rebellion movie in 1979 called Over the Edge that used a bunch of Cheap Trick songs in the soundtrack, particularly the song "Surrender"...watch that movie and you'll understand...
Fun fact: "Hello There" exists because in the early days they frequently didn't get a sound check. It was a simple way for their sound guy to ride the faders and come up with a mix on the fly as each instrument joins in.Hey, I was leaning toward launching into "Hello, There" at Heelstock, but as I was leaning toward it, aomeone else jumped in :(