telecaster911
Kick Henry Jackassowski
I found this on the guitar guru page.
Yeah, but the one in the OP says Gibson.
Yeah, that's weird to me...I find it hilarious that many people who buy such 'copies' talk about how great they are and often about how much better they are than the big brand but always go with the 'fake' big brand label. So, this guy says the previous owner did it...fine. I got that. It doesn't change the fact that the brand is the brand for that brand's products and many look at it as a design element which further adds 'value' to the brand.
I think it's because a lot of laymen don't take a guitar serious unless it's a Fender or a Gibson, because it's what they know. I've seen people get called out at local shows for having a five grand boutique Tele. "Oh you can't afford a real Fender huh?". What I don't get is why people care so much what the headstock says, and why they care so much about what other people think of the instrument they use.I find it hilarious that many people who buy such 'copies' talk about how great they are and often about how much better they are than the big brand but always go with the 'fake' big brand label. So, this guy says the previous owner did it...fine. I got that. It doesn't change the fact that the brand is the brand for that brand's products and many look at it as a design element which further adds 'value' to the brand.
ROFLI used to have people look at my Suhrs and ask if I was saving for a "Real Fender".
I would never give a tiny little sh!t whether or not someone called me out for not having this or that. I have a difficult time understanding how anyone who has the nerve to play in front of an audience would be the least bit bothered by what someone might say about their guitar/gear. I am not denying that it is so. I am saying that it is absurd.