I don't know if I'd say the goal is to be faithful to the recorded mix. I'd bet goals vary from listener to listener. But I've always thought the larger goal was to make it sound good, hence the popular use of vacuum tubes which can impart that pleasant distortion.
I think the old vacuum tube amplifiers add a certain warmth, but that's not really something that should be on the listener side.
That's going to come through on the recording side.
I guess it is sort of a "Vinyl sounds better than a CD" argument, you know?
The job of your home stereo shouldn't be to color the recording in any way (or as little as possible). Lots of home speaker brands have lines that claim to be "Studio Monitors", they're usually pretty pricey.
I dunno....I guess you pays your money, and you takes your choice.
Some of the best speakers I have ever heard were old BBC Rogers speakers. Un-fucking-believable. They were pretty small, too, but they were driven by a nice power amp (Solid State).
You can hear things on a nice setup that I guaran-damn-tee you can't hear on these being offered.
For instance on one of SRV's records, the way it was recorded, you can hear the springs under the snare vibrating on Little Wing. This happened in the studio, during the recording. You can't hear that without good quality stuff. You'd never notice it.
There are all kinds of instances of things like that.
But, I get that sometimes price is a concern.......I would just think that if you were actually recording/mixing your stuff for production, you'd be hard pressed to beat a nice stereo amp and a pair of good quality home speakers. Not cheap shit, but pretty good stuff.....
But, to Mark's point, sometimes price/space/environment is a concern, in which case....I can understand that.