Danhedonia
Noted duckfat enthusiast
OK - so help me out. I have a Squier Jazz bass where I think I need to do a bit of work on the neck, but was considering replacing the bridge. The bridge is flimsy pot metal. What would you suggest?
OK - so help me out. I have a Squier Jazz bass where I think I need to do a bit of work on the neck, but was considering replacing the bridge. The bridge is flimsy pot metal. What would you suggest?
OK - so help me out. I have a Squier Jazz bass where I think I need to do a bit of work on the neck, but was considering replacing the bridge. The bridge is flimsy pot metal. What would you suggest?
That LP gets me chubby.You're playing a les paul through a marshall, it better sound just like that, lol. :rawk:
FWIW, my les paul custom is pretty heavy (not 15 pounds, maybe 10), and it sustains pretty well.
This tele was made for me by a friend, it's solid maple, maple top, birdseye maple neck with an ebony fingerboard. It's a tank, about 15 pounds. It has a seymour duncan hot rails in the bridge - sustains for days.... I do believe weight has something to do with it, but the makeup of the wood does as well.
<Gasp>Marketing
Don't get me wrong, it isn't that there can't be significant improvements over a flimsy or crappy bridge... it's just that a bridge improving tone simply because it has mass is a fallacy IMO. Tighter fit and over all quality will allow strings to do their job without robbing their energy. That's what you want really.
I weigh about 300lbs and I tend to get compliments on my tone.
I guess I'm just not sold on this bridge
In regards to what?
In regards to I want the other bridge on a Titan!
But it has to be a top loader for a strat hardtail, right? Something about the ferrules not lining up?Gotcha!
I'm not sure it'll fit. I don't know why it has that goofy post on the side but if it's normal hardtail tele or strat mounting you're welcome to use one
But it has to be a top loader for a strat hardtail, right? Something about the ferrules not lining up?