Music legends...the burn out vs. the fade away?

Dogsinplastic

avuncular to no one
I actually started drafting a thread before Dexter posted this thread:


I was basically wondering how we feel about folks like Macca, Paul Simon, JT, Dylan, Joni, and others continuing to perform as we can all see and hear their skills deteriorate. It seems like 95+% it's focused on vocals. Some folks that are not much younger than the aforementioned still have a lot to offer, with Robert Plant being one of the best examples. Part of that is his adaptation to aging, not sure there has been a more graceful one in the world of big voiced popular singers in the age of the "rock star".

Of course jazz and blues singers have done this forever, but they were generally less about vocal theatrics or histrionics. Opera singers are the closest, but their extremely regiment training is all about vocal preservation. Modern pop, rock, prog, metal, etc. singers are often pushing the limits of their voices, sometimes to a breaking point. In the case of those listed above, a big part is the inevitability of again (if we're lucky).

McCartney and JT have been clean for 40+ years, vegans too I believe, but they can't sing like they used to. James was always a stellar singer, but he was really killing it vocally in the 90s and 2000s...I'm not sure when his voice started to go, but there's some stuff from about a decade where you can already hear significant dip in power, tone, and agility. Simon might have been a vocal overachiever, but he sounded so good for so long...I think he a mix of age and the deafness he's dealing with (but I'm guessing we could compare and contrast footage of before and after the hearing issues to see if there's a chicken or egg element). Joni ravaged her voice with booze and drugs, but it was the smoking that really took it's toll...apparently she still "sneaks" e-cigs.

It's really hardest or most obvious on big singers, but it can clearly hit all sorts of musicians. At some point, despite the decades of performance and practice, brass and woodwind players have to hit a wall...the combination of lung power, embouchure, and finger agility is extremely demanding. Drummers and percussionists have extreme physical demands. Neil Peart talked about his struggles to play at the level he expected of himself and that the music they'd created demanded. Mike Portnoy recently spoke to how he's feeling it at 57, which is only six years younger than when Neal retired.

As a fan I'm happy to have legends continue from the perspective of this is who they are and what they do. However, it can be quite difficult to watch them age to a point where they aren't able to do what they've done, what they expect, what we expect... That said, I'd've loved to hear/see what Jimi, Kurt, and others (that never got or allowed themselves the chance to continue) would have done. Where would the muse have taken them, how would they have evolved...? I'm more about the fade away I guess.
 
How do I feel about it? I'm not planning to shell out $300-$500 for a ticket to listen to bombed out vocal cords from a legend in concert. But, if others are willing, I have no issue with singers performing way past their prime.

It is interesting that certain singers still have great voices in old age. Glenn Hughes and Tommy Shaw still blow me away with their current vocal chops.

Some fans take issue when singers tune down their hit songs to match changes in their vocal range. I don't have a problem with that as long as their voice still sounds good in the lower range.

If I were a legendary singer/musician, with a bombed out voice, who wanted to continue performing, I'd hire a great, unknown vocalist to sing with me live. Alison Krauss and Robert Plant certainly sing well together. You hire some unknown to sing with you, elevate their status, and it's a win/win for the unknown and the audience.
 
It baffles me that people do not understand that getting older really changes you physically and bitch about a performer, singers mostly, in their elder years. My grandparents lived with us from when I was 13 to 15. Prior to that there were long drives to the hospital and staying with them over for 3 or 4 days in the hospital and when they got out. From 68 to 80 was not a good time for a couple of them. So when I see some of these people propped up on stage I wonder how they do it. Granted they were not farmers or lumbermen, which my family were. Long hard days where Sunday was your day off.

Jimi really wasn’t a singer IMO. He sang in his talking voice . Kurt was a screamer and I don’t think that would last.

I remember James Hetfield blew his voice out. He was furoicios up to the Black Album. Watch the live shit binge and purge dvds. Some time there after it changed. Since he’s aged he’s actually gotten some of it back.

I think Bob Dylan stopped giving a shit.

Saw Satriani and Vai last year and both played great and sounded great. No aggressive stage moves. Still worth the price of admission.
 
Who’s JT?

James Taylor. His Live album from the early 90s showcases his voice at a ridiculously high level. We saw twice at SPAC in the late '90s and he was incredible. Watching clips from the last 10+ years shows a drastic drop in his vocal abilities. Less a shift to a lower or lesser range, but the power and dynamics are pretty much gone. Definitely reality, but still hard to watch and hear.
 
Saw Satriani and Vai last year and both played great and sounded great. No aggressive stage moves. Still worth the price of admission.

For a significantly older musician, I finally saw John McLaughlin with Shakti in 2023. At 81 he was still tearing it up...doing stuff I struggled to touch when I was at my best as a player. Some folks don't seem to age much, but again, with singers it's usually different.
 
If they are still producing art that I can appreciate I have no problem with them continuing to create it regardless of age or technical ability. But washed up artists who havnt produced anything worthwhile in 20-50 years? Nah.
That said I’m not paying going rates for a stadium or arena ticket for anybody regardless of their age or how good they are or were. I’ve reached an age and an intolerance level for crowds that experience isn’t worth it to me regardless.
 
James Taylor. His Live album from the early 90s showcases his voice at a ridiculously high level. We saw twice at SPAC in the late '90s and he was incredible. Watching clips from the last 10+ years shows a drastic drop in his vocal abilities. Less a shift to a lower or lesser range, but the power and dynamics are pretty much gone. Definitely reality, but still hard to watch and hear.
I know all his work just not going only JT. I agree.

He’s another, to me anyway, that sings almost in his talking voice. As long as the songs are good seems he can never stop. Sad that is voice has taken a hit.
 
Neil Young Paradox? Well it isn't a paradox, more like an irony.

Not saying that I wish Neil had died young, BTW. :cheers:
 
I think is artists adapt their music to what they can still do as they age, that’s the best for everyone.

Do old songs in a different key, if you can. The majority of people won’t know unless it’s a drastic change.

New songs? Write to what you can actually do.

Also, if you’re still creating new music in your older years, do that live. Less of the old stuff that you can’t pull off anymore.
Fuck the “play the hits” people.

As fans, we should grow with our favourite artists.
 
Dodge, that's where Plant is killing it for me. He's been doing new music, writing for or selecting what to sing based on what he thinks he can do justice to. But he does do the hits, he's just worked up new versions, arrangements, etc. to accommodate the changes in his vocals...and they're awesome.

I've been listening to (and watching) the Drumeo video with Kenny Aronoff in the Yes thread...Kenny is 71 and still killing it as drumming, doing live gigs and tours when called. He's got the physique of cut 50 year old...crazy:
 
Last edited:
Not everyone ages the same.

Tommy Shaw recorded this vocal when he was 69. Singing starts at :39…


Tommy Shaw Live at Daryl’s House still has a great voice (age 67) now 71. By comparison, Daryl Hall (74) now 78, has lost much of his singing abilities. Perhaps, Tommy will lose much of his voice at or before 74, 78. Singing starts at 5:22…


Styx -Lawrence Gowan 68 - Tommy Shaw 71 - lead vocals - live -2024. It’s a phone recording. Lawrence starts singing lead at 1:13. Tommy sings at 7.01…


Glenn Hughes 73. Singing starts :26…
 
Last edited:
Another example of a singer/musician who, from a musical perspective, seems to defy the aging process, is Taj Mahal. I saw him live for the first time last year. At 82 years old, the other musicians had to help him to a seat at the front of the stage. Yet, his playing and vocals were great.

 
I saw him back in 1995; I love his acoustic blues. He is doing a show with Keb Mo locally this summer. He hails from nearby Springfield, so it is close to home for him. I may get tickets.
 
Not everyone ages the same.

Tommy Shaw recorded this vocal when he was 69. Singing starts at :39…


Tommy Shaw Live at Daryl’s House still has a great voice (age 67) now 71. By comparison, Daryl Hall (74) now 78, has lost much of his singing abilities. Perhaps, Tommy will lose much of his voice at or before 74, 78. Singing starts at 5:22…


Styx -Lawrence Gowan 68 - Tommy Shaw 71 - lead vocals - live -2024. It’s a phone recording. Lawrence starts singing lead at 1:13. Tommy sings at 7.01…


Glenn Hughes 73. Singing starts :26…

Glenn Hughes 2 days ago.

Still wailing. Pretty amazing that he can pull that off.

 
Back
Top